Project news

Three shark clichés that drive me crazy!

By Andrew Nosal, 8th October 2014

1. Jaws-esque background music in documentaries

Have you noticed the music (a la ‘Jaws’) that often accompanies shark footage in documentaries? How about the music (a la ‘Flipper’) that typically accompanies dolphin footage? I have always wondered whether our fear of sharks and love of dolphins is mostly learned or even subconsciously programmed by societal norms. Could the overuse of ominous background music subconsciously incite fear and loathing of sharks, and by extension, a reluctance to protect them? Alternatively, could beautiful and uplifting background music actually rouse positive sentiment for sharks and counteract their maligned image?

These are precisely the questions my SOSF-funded research project intends to answer. This project will ask thousands of human subjects to watch a one-minute excerpt of swimming sharks randomly set to ominous, uplifting or no music (experimental control), and then to complete a survey that measures their perception of sharks (e.g., how scary or beautiful sharks are to them) and their willingness to protect sharks (e.g., how much they would donate to a shark conservation charity).

See for yourself. Here are two versions of the same video excerpt, provided by SOSF. The first version has ominous music (Track 9 ‘Sharks’ from the Blue Planet: Seas of Life soundtrack by George Fenton) and the second version has uplifting music (Track 1 ‘The Blue Planet’ from the Blue Planet: Seas of Life soundtrack by George Fenton).

Swimming sharks with ominous background music

Swimming sharks with uplifting background music

The often-menacing background music in shark documentaries may be a subtle – yet powerful –source of fear that has gone largely unnoticed. Because documentaries are the primary source of information about sharks for the general public, addressing this issue is vitally important. At the very least, I hope this project will raise awareness so that informed viewers will be more likely to recognise scary background music in documentaries and not be affected by it.

In my next post I will share sample survey questions and preliminary results from our study, which is currently underway! But scary background music is certainly not the only thing that needs to change when it comes to curbing the inaccurate knowledge of sharks and stereotypes perpetuated by mass media…

2. Gruesome shark attacks

Consider these sensationalised headlines:

California body boarder killed in gruesome shark attack | Fox News

http://fxn.ws/1mmhsNp

Bodyboarder ‘cut in half’ in horrific shark attack off Australian coast | NY Daily News

http://nydn.us/1DnjW3C

Vicious shark attack kills Australian bodyboarder | NBC Today

http://on.today.com/1rlnOgK

Gruesome, horrific and vicious shark attacks – as opposed to what? Pleasant, delightful and gentle shark attacks? Shark bites on people are inherently violent, but sensationalised reports of these incidents (accidents, really) that use idle words like ‘gruesome’ only elicit hysteria. And is the word ‘attack’ even appropriate? ‘Attack’ is such a loaded word that conjures up deliberately cruel – even criminal – acts, like terrorist attacks. SOSF project leader Chris Neff explored this issue in an article published in the Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences.

3. Shark-infested waters

Now consider these sensationalised headlines:

US tourists survive 12-hour ordeal in shark-infested Caribbean waters | The Guardian

http://bit.ly/1uObpBD

Fishermen survive shark-infested waters for 25 days floating on icebox | The Guardian

http://bit.ly/1uObzZW

Divers drift for seven hours in shark-infested waters off Australia | The Times

http://thetim.es/1p3ZJpL

Really? Aren’t those waters then equally infested with dolphins, seals, whales and sea turtles? Unless said waters are in a bathtub or toilet, where sharks arguably do not belong, the term ‘shark-infested waters’ is hackneyed and counterproductive. Waters teeming with, or better yet, thriving with sharks are healthy and balanced and the goal of conservationists!

Andrew Nosal

Andrew Nosal

Simply put, you cannot infest your own home. If anything, we can describe waters as infested with humans.

Andrew Nosal

Andrew Nosal

Sadly, overuse of ‘shark-infested waters’ has now landed this phrase as a usage example in most dictionary entries for ‘infest’, along with ‘termite-infested houses’, ‘crime-infested slums’, and ‘rat-infested sewers’. For example,

Infest | Merriam-Webster Dictionary
http://bit.ly/1qRsz2g

Infest | Dictionary.com
http://bit.ly/1v0nWRK

Infest | Oxford Dictionary

This phrase should really be stricken from public discourse, starting with reputable media outlets via a revision to the Associated Press (AP) Stylebook.

I could not agree more with Baba Dioum that, ‘We will conserve only what we love’ [paraphrased]. Until we love sharks as much as we love dolphins, shark conservation will move slower than it otherwise could. We can start with improving public opinion of sharks by ridding ourselves of these silly shark clichés.

Leave a Reply

Project See project and more news